| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stancaris
Allowance Winner
Joined: 16 Sep 2004
Posts: 422
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 1:32 pm Post subject: tail female lines |
 |
|
| To all: lets say I find a horse in family 1 who traces in tail-female to Doxa who was a foal in 1901. Can i say with confidence that the horse in question most likely actually had Doxa in tail female or has the number of mistakes in the original studbook based on haplotype DNA research really made the female family not predictable even though the pedigree traces to the above mentioned mare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pan Zareta
Grade I Winner
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 1666
Location: west TX boonies
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:20 pm Post subject: Re: tail female lines |
|
|
| stancaris wrote: | | To all: lets say I find a horse in family 1 who traces in tail-female to Doxa who was a foal in 1901. Can i say with confidence that the horse in question most likely actually had Doxa in tail female or has the number of mistakes in the original studbook based on haplotype DNA research really made the female family not predictable even though the pedigree traces to the above mentioned mare. |
The only publicly documented anomaly established by mtDNA haplotyping in family 1 is not in Doxa's branch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
brogers
Allowance Winner
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 424
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The lines we have tested to Doxa (and by that to the same ancestor of Tregonwells Natural Barb mare) seem to be 'right' in terms of classification.
Why the question?
_________________
Byron Rogers
Performance Genetics
www.performancegenetics.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
