| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zinn21 3rd Year Sire
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 3306
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the key to sound horses is the art of stress and recovery at early stages. I like stressing them as fall yearlings, mid winter and early summer. Then they go to the track and some get short two week recovery break as they move through their workout progressions. My results with last 6 horses going through program:
Horse A: 50 starts
Horse B: 43 starts
Horse C: 56 starts-still racing
Horse D: 53 starts
Horse E: 10 starts-currently racing-completely sound
Horse F: 6 starts-currently racing-completely sound
Total earnings for above horses: $445,000.00
Above horse's dams; 3 raced and 2 unraced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Toccet02 3rd Year Sire

Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 3313 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Toccet02 wrote: | High Yield by Storm Cat ex Forty Niner mare family 2n Heart Disease
Unnamed 2005 colt by Storm Cat ex Gone West mare family 1g heart attack post workout
Hennessy by Storm Cat ex Hawaii mare family 8c heart attack
Sailors Warning by Storm Cat ex Private Account mare family 5f heart attack
Tabasco Cat by Storm Cat ex Sauce Boat mare family 12d heart attack
All of these conditions or attacks were diagnosed or caused death before age 18. One was 2YO and one was 6. This set off warning bells for me about Storm cat. His sons also seem to transmit heart problems but I'll only supply data if one is interested. |
I should have added... what makes this statistically significant, in my opinion, is that I only have 10 Storm Cat sired horses in my database. half of them, the 5 above, had heart issues. _________________ All shouting does is make you lose your voice.
----Arrested Development |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crystal Freshman Sire
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 2799 Location: Lexington, KY
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly if you guys think the only workouts horses do are the ones in the DRF you are nuts and have never spent the morning on the backside.
The general public is always going to view horse racing as cruel because it is a sport based around money. We don't pull ponies out of a field on a saturday afternoon and trailer over to the racetrack and hire a jockey to ride a race.
Money is spent so it can be earned back. It is a business and should be treated and respected like so. Passion and care for all the animals should be why you continue to be in the business day after day but a love of the sport and desire to win is why you should get into it in the first place.
But really 6-of-10 trainers out there don't know why they do what they do to condition a horse they just know what has been taught to them and what seems to work for them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElPrado Grade II Winner

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 1478 Location: Tampa
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Trainers would rather rely on chemicals than actual training. Also, tracks aren't set up for real horse training any more. If there were a real track used for training into the afternoon, the time constraints the trainers now have wouldn't be in play. Horses need more exercise than a half hour a day then sitting in a stall for 23 1/2 hours. They weren't evolved for that.
Training methods are different in Europe, Australia, etc. The horses aren't stabled at the track. The trainers have private tracks or turf gallops to use during daylight hours. In the States, you have a stall, the horse is saddled, worked, bathed, cooled and stuck back in the stall. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casallc Restricted Stakes Winner
Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 914 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ratherrapid wrote: |
As to lasix as a cause--that is rather ridiculous logically, although I'd normally fear such a debate with casallc. Simple logic. #1, they only get lasix once every two weeks at most, and thus, whatever mineral is depleted is limited to that day. Additionally, assuming ur trainer has any sense the horse will receive post race mineral supplement to make up for any loss. You r also wrongly assuming that loss of mineral from the blood stream due to lasix somehow leaches calcium out of the bones, and there's zero evidence that happens. Thus, after a lasix shot there may be a temporary lower electrolyte mineral content in the blood stream.
|
I am a little biased on Lasix because I took it every day for several years - I HATE it. It makes you feel like crap and I'm sure is the reason for the term "have to piss like a racehorse", because you will be running for at least six hours (hence the name LA SIX because the effect LAst SIX hours). Thanks to some stents in my heart and the loss of 65 pounds I no longer need to take it. Now for the horse:
Precautions, side effects, and administration (in horses)
Furosemide is injected either intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV), usually 0.5-1.0 mg/kg 2x/day. As with many diuretics, it can cause dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, including loss of potassium, calcium, sodium, and magnesium. It is especially important to prevent potassium loss. Excessive use of furosemide will most likely lead to a metabolic alkalosis due to hypochloremia and hypokalemia. The drug should therefore not be used in horses that are dehydrated or experiencing kidney failure. It should be used with caution in horses with liver problems or electrolyte abnormalities. Overdose may lead to dehydration, change in drinking patterns and urination, seizures, GI problems, kidney damage, lethargy, collapse, and coma.
Furosemide should be used with caution when combined with corticosteroids (as this increases the risk of electrolyte imbalance), aminoglycoside antibiotics (increases risk of kidney or ear damage), and trimethoprim sulfa (causes decreased platelet count). It may also cause interactions with anesthesics, so its use should be related to the veterinarian if the animal is going into surgery and it decreases the kidney's ability to excrete aspirin, so dosages will need to be adjusted if combined with that drug.
Furosemide may increase the risk of digoxin toxicity due to hypokalemia.
It should not be used in horses with pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (Cushings).
Furosemide is detectable in urine 36–72 hours following injection. Its use is prohibited by most equestrian organizations. – Wikipedia
Now from my experience as a trainer. Granted I have not been on the track as a trainer for over 25 years but I have plenty of experience with lasix and those who used it then. Lasix wasn’t used nearly to the extent that it is today for many reasons. The primary reason was in the early days your horse actually had to be a bleeder to receive lasix. Today most horse that get lasix certainly don’t need it but the standard has been so relaxed than any horse can get approved for lasix. It is my opinion a REAL bleeder should not even be on the race track neither should they be bred.
The users of lasix back in my day were for the most part needle trainers. They used lasix for the masking effect for other drugs to move their horse up hopefully undetected. They also liked the “tucked up” effect they could achieve without actually putting in the miles to really get a horse in shape, it helps disguise laziness on their part to owners. Many trainers withhold the water bucket for several hours before the race, the dehydration effect caused by lasix is on horses that have been denied water is asking for trouble and my opinion the prime reasons of horses keeling over dead on the race track. There is a reason lasix is banned in human athletics, it’s for its masking effects. There is also a placebo effect I can describe if any one is interested.
Seems the horse racing industry wants to keep their head in the sand on this issue too. I would like to see ALL medications banned (72 hrs before race) or not test for anything and stop being hypocritical about the issue. _________________ There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.
- Alexis de Tocqueville |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ratherrapid Grade III Winner
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 1241 Location: kansas city, missouri
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
might have different effects with different folk. there was an old lawyer here that took lasix and i ask him, out of curiosity, the effect which he referred to the constant restroom trips. He said other than that he noticed very little effect, but will take ur word for it casallc. I've seen horses that seem a little down after the shot.
Nevertheless, the effect of lasix has to be weighed. Weight it #1 with the practice of "drawing the horse" and numerous other stupidities that were done to prevent EIPH before lasix. And secondly do you want EIPH or whatever small real or imagined negatives there are with lasix.
For small owners lasix is a necessity on dirt tracks, or u're going to inevitably lose ur horse to EIPH. Again, the idea that lasix "leaches" minerals is likely true, but that this is harmful is likely untrue. There's also now evidence out there that with modern testing methods that lasix is no longer a masking agent.
Finally, I fear the current antilasix movement--and few are aware of this--is being used by the leaders of the jockey club to try to close smaller tracks, shrink the sport, and bring the profits into the control of a few deep pockets. Rich owners can retire their bleeders. For the rest of us, if we retire our horse we also retire ourselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casallc Restricted Stakes Winner
Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 914 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ratherrapid wrote: | might have different effects with different folk. there was an old lawyer here that took lasix and i ask him, out of curiosity, the effect which he referred to the constant restroom trips. He said other than that he noticed very little effect, but will take ur word for it casallc. 1. I've seen horses that seem a little down after the shot.
Nevertheless, the effect of lasix has to be weighed. Weight it #1 with the practice of "drawing the horse" and numerous other stupidities that were done to prevent EIPH before lasix. 2. And secondly do you want EIPH or whatever small real or imagined negatives there are with lasix.
3. For small owners lasix is a necessity on dirt tracks, or u're going to inevitably lose ur horse to EIPH. 4. Again, the idea that lasix "leaches" minerals is likely true, but that this is harmful is likely untrue. There's also now evidence out there that with modern testing methods that lasix is no longer a masking agent.
5. Finally, I fear the current antilasix movement--and few are aware of this--is being used by the leaders of the jockey club to try to close smaller tracks, shrink the sport, and bring the profits into the control of a few deep pockets. Rich owners can retire their bleeders. For the rest of us, if we retire our horse we also retire ourselves. |
1. Actually I have seen it differently which brings me to the placebo effect I did not elaborate on in my previous post. The tracks where I ran you took your horses to the state vet at the test barn who was the only one who could administer lasix. Most of the horses walked over to the barn like they were going on a walk after they got the shot they came back on their toes like a different horse. Two things could bring that reaction on – 1. the shot is the signal the race is on just by the horse putting 2+2 together 2. It was common practice to take horse to the bush tracks and load them up with whatever - ritalin, crank, etc. and run them hopped up a few times. When you get in a test barn situation you just stick an empty needle in their neck and they think they are hopped. Placebo effect both ways.
2. Do I want EIPH? No, as I said REAL bleeders should not be on the track and breeding to them should be discouraged. It would be amazing how many bleeders would have miraculous recoveries.
3. This one I will agree with you on but it is a necessity for everyone to run on lasix or you will be giving up 20# or more in weight. The dust on racetracks is not nearly what horses will encounter in their natural environments so that’s a moot point. Every other nation in the world doesn’t seem to have the bleeder problem we profess to have. Why? They run on lasix when they get here so they won’t have the weight disadvantage.
4. I have not seen those studies, do you have a link?
5. I would hope this is a plot by the Jockey Club elites – it would be the first time they loosened their grip on the status quo. I fear it is only feigning concern for appearance. _________________ There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.
- Alexis de Tocqueville |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crystal Freshman Sire
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 2799 Location: Lexington, KY
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anyone who says race day Lasix should be banned should have seen me the day I walked a 2nd place runner in a 25k MSW race back to the barn covered in blood. My face, my arms, my collared shirt just blood everywhere. The horse choking on blood, coughing (yacking), throwing his head everywhere and trying to go down and thrash his body around on the track because he was literally being choked by his own blood..
First time (and last time) he ever ran without lasix. He trained for 6 months w/o lasix and was at the peak of perfection with fitness. He bled like a pig the first time he ran. I cleaned blood out of my hair and eyes that night.
He obviously was given time off and given lasix (b/c he was on the bleeders list now) and came back to win his next start and 5 races in his career before his owners retired him.
Is it more cruel to give Lasix or not too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zinn21 3rd Year Sire
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 3306
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
crystal wrote:
| Quote: | | anyone who says race day Lasix should be banned should have seen me the day I walked a 2nd place runner in a 25k MSW race back to the barn covered in blood. My face, my arms, my collared shirt just blood everywhere. The horse choking on blood, coughing (yacking), throwing his head everywhere and trying to go down and thrash his body around on the track because he was literally being choked by his own blood.. |
And that's the bottom line-it does help prevent bleeding. The real question-does a horse who does not bleed benefit from the use of lasix over and above the prevention of bleeding? And if it does, should horses who do not bleed without lasix receive lasix anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griff Leading Sire
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 3513 Location: Yorktown, VA
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZINN22
where I race a Vet has to certify that a horse is a bleeder before he gets on the LASIX list..
That is not a real impediment as you can find blood with a scope in most horses after a hard work and even more after a hard race.
griff _________________ "We has met the enemy and he is us" [Pogo] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shammy Davis Chef de Race: Classic
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 4451
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
For the most part the experts agree that lasix helps.
To another issue on the subject of this thread.
Most recently, I've been looking at GI ulcers having an effect on the overall athletic abilities in the actively training racehorse. I've searched far and wide, but have found nothing specific on the subject. I'm wondering if any of you have any thoughts on this or you know of any resources on the subject.
Ten percent of all horses suffer colic annually. I'm sure the incidence is much higher in the TB, particularly in the OTTB. I haven't been able to find any resources on the annual number of actively trained racehorses that suffer colic either or have been identified as suffering with ulcers.
Statistics indicate that 90% of all horses participating in sport disciplines suffer with GI ulcers. Can't help but think that this is an issue that would definitely effect the entire physical health of the racehorse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
docjocoy Restricted Stakes Winner
Joined: 02 Aug 2007 Posts: 807 Location: CT/CA
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shammy Davis wrote: | For the most part the experts agree that lasix helps.
To another issue on the subject of this thread.
Most recently, I've been looking at GI ulcers having an effect on the overall athletic abilities in the actively training racehorse. I've searched far and wide, but have found nothing specific on the subject. I'm wondering if any of you have any thoughts on this or you know of any resources on the subject.
Ten percent of all horses suffer colic annually. I'm sure the incidence is much higher in the TB, particularly in the OTTB. I haven't been able to find any resources on the annual number of actively trained racehorses that suffer colic either or have been identified as suffering with ulcers.
Statistics indicate that 90% of all horses participating in sport disciplines suffer with GI ulcers. Can't help but think that this is an issue that would definitely effect the entire physical health of the racehorse. |
Certainly not scientific, but my trainers at santa Anita, and then Golden Gate, said most of their horses had some form of GI ulcers and treated them all for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casallc Restricted Stakes Winner
Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 914 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shammy Davis wrote: | For the most part the experts agree that lasix helps.
To another issue on the subject of this thread.
Most recently, I've been looking at GI ulcers having an effect on the overall athletic abilities in the actively training racehorse. I've searched far and wide, but have found nothing specific on the subject. I'm wondering if any of you have any thoughts on this or you know of any resources on the subject.
Ten percent of all horses suffer colic annually. I'm sure the incidence is much higher in the TB, particularly in the OTTB. I haven't been able to find any resources on the annual number of actively trained racehorses that suffer colic either or have been identified as suffering with ulcers.
Statistics indicate that 90% of all horses participating in sport disciplines suffer with GI ulcers. Can't help but think that this is an issue that would definitely effect the entire physical health of the racehorse. |
Ulcers are extremely debilitating to racehorses. I have read several studies on it. I’ll get the links and post. Ulcers are treated like "bleeders" at the track - they get treated whether the need it or not. Only with ulcer treatment it doesn't debilitate the horse - only your bank account.
http://veterinarynews.dvm360.com/dvm/Veterinary+Equine/Treating-gastric-ulcers-in-racehorses/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/658784
http://www.mitavite.com.au/mitavite06/PDF/Nutritional%20Information%20PDF/vet%20notes/stomach%20ulcers%20in%20horses.pdf
http://www.valleyvet.com/Library/lib_533RX_-Gastric_Ulcer_Syndrome.pdf _________________ There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.
- Alexis de Tocqueville |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casallc Restricted Stakes Winner
Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 914 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Foes of Lasix are Cruel to Horses? Ridiculous Nonsense!
Our brilliant vets and trainers have discovered the only drug in the history of the world with no negative side effects, amazing! How lucky are our horses, huh?
What many horsemen fail to realize is that young 2yo horses are more than just a pair of lungs, most importantly they are running around with a still-developing skeletal system until past age 3. Proper exercise and nutrition has been shown to maximize bone density during this very important development phase for the competitive equine – but nearly no thought has been given to what undermines this skeletal foundation.
Everyone realizes that calcium is one of the necessary ingredients for bone health in humans and horses, it stands to reason that an owner/trainer would prefer that calcium be readily available for a growing horse. As a matter of fact, the marketplace is full of supplements containing extra calcium meant to optimize bone remodeling, so it must be on some radar screens.
Lasix causes the horse to excrete fluid, and accompanying this fluid loss is the loss of certain minerals, of which calcium is one. You see, Furosemide was developed in humans not to prevent EIPH, but to prevent kidney failure. While calcium is necessary for healthy bone growth and maintenance, it is an enemy of the diseased kidney, therefore Furosemide is used to get rid of it through excessive urination. So what we are left with is a young horse that is repeatedly asked to stress his bones at the maximum during breezes and races – all while being forced to do so without adequate amounts of calcium around to repair the subsequent damage. Read more:
http://thoroedge.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/foes-of-lasix-are-cruel-to-horses-ridiculous-nonsense/ _________________ There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.
- Alexis de Tocqueville |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bdw0617 Darley line

Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 8956 Location: Little Rock, AR
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i never thought about it like that but it makes perfect sense. it's why when you are losing weight and taking in less cals than you would normally you have to take a mutil vitimian because you aren't getting your necessary amount from your normal diet. _________________ "When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|