stlouiskid wrote:Of course not. But I make darn sure when I do sell a broodmare it is going to a good home.
Then I find Jellac a much more credible source than you are, because he/she has made every reasonable effort to find good homes for his/her horses
and follow up on them when possible. It's nice that you found homes for your broodies. How about the pinhooks? How about the foals you didn't like out of the broodies you gave away? If you're not keeping track, you're certainly not part of the solution.
More importantly, I question why you aren't comprehending that if the Asmussen operation intended for those mares to go to slaughter...or simply didn't care...why did they breed them and why did they ship them as far as they did at their own expense when there was a closer option? Jellac's arguments for unintentional negligence are very compelling because of the application of facts and logic to the situation. You haven't applied either. In fact, you contradicted yourself:
For a guy like Steve Asmussen, who is making millions of dollars a year in this business, to send a broodmare he owned to the killers is criminal in my mind. How much a year would it cost him to turn out a mare on the huge property they have down there.
Cash was sued for going belly up on a 3 million dollar loan three years ago. My question is why are you breeding more horses when you can't pay for the ones you already have?
Steve isn't Cash, but you brought both of their names into it. Make up your mind. They have money to support their horses in perpetuity, or they don't.
I personally do not condone the horse slaughter industry, but I would certainly euthanize any horse of mine before turning it out on drought-stricken land that cannot support it, as you recommended. Even a ride on a slaughter bound truck is better than slow starvation.
I would, on another note, be interested to know if the Asmussens advertised any of those mares before sending them to the sale. Does anyone know?