Bast wrote:kimberley mine wrote:Another article:
http://www.ivis.org/proceedings/aaep/2000/39.pdfHoof angles control the weight distribution
between heel and toe of the hoof—lower angles
cause the heel to bear more weight. Dollar
(1898) noted: “In upright hoofs the heels
bear less weight than in flat hoofs.”14 More
recent research by Barrey (1991) found that at
a 39° hoof angle, 75% of the weight bears on
the heels and 25% on the toe; at a 47° hoof
angle, 63% of the weight bears on the heels;
and at a 55° hoof angle, 43% of the weight
bears on the heels.15 Since the the greater
the load the slower the growth, this helps to
explain the vicious cycle of the long toe and
under-run heel.
A tired horse, an underbanked turn, and long toes are a recipe for disaster.
The abstract makes a point on the crowning of race courses, to aid in drainage. I'd love to read it and am nowhere close to the library.
One of the most notable features of US racecourses are how narrow they are compared to international courses, and thus have a tighter turning radius. (Although, from memory, Palermo seemed to be built like a US track.) Aussie, Kiwi, South African, and British tracks are largely pear-shaped with the majority of routes run around one long, sweeping turn. Those courses also have 1200m straights over which the sprints are run.
It would be
very interesting to compare catastrophic fracture incidence while racing through the turn between the Santa Anita turf course and the main tracks at Flemington (in Melbourne), over a 5-year period encompassing all 7/8f races (1400-1600m). At a guess, I would expect to see the following:
1. Comparatively more breakdowns in the left fore in the US than in Aussie (because they run clockwise at those two tracks);
2. Comparatively more breakdowns in the two US tracks than the Aussie tracks (in keeping with the current trend);
3. A sample size large enough to make meaningful statistical comparisons;
4. And in line with the above, a longitudinal sample of sufficient duration to smooth out any odd instances in a given year (e.g. a spate of breakdowns after unusually wet weather).
What would be interesting is to see the ratio of breakdowns on the turn--fewer in the wider turn than the tight turn, or vice versa?
The 1400m to 1600m is important: those are one-turn races in the US, whereas longer tend to be around two turns. Since the Flemington races run over one turn unless the race is more than 2400m (which aside from the San Juan Capistrano will never be run in the US), it's impossible to make an apples-to-apples comparison outside those two distances. The choice of Santa Anita and Flemington is also important, as the two areas have a very similar climate, are at about the same latitude, and are very, very flat (unlike many euro gallops).