Which Mating Has More Promise?

Get advice on your broodmares and stallion selection.

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn, Diane

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Which Mating Has More Promise?

Postby BJ » Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:55 pm

3x3 Icecapade
4x4 Nearctic
4x4 Shenanigans
5x5 Native Dancer

Proposed sire stats =
32 Starts, 6 Wins, 8 Places, 0 Shows Career Earnings: $501,615
5% Stakes winners from foals/12% Stakes horses
At 3 2nd Volante Handicap -G3, Bay Meadows Derby -G3, El Cajon S. (R) (O)
At 4 Won Charles H. Strub S.

Proposed Dam's record is 4-1-1-0, she is a full sister to a CA Stakes Winner & NTR setter, as well as two other full siblings with earnings over $100k.

or

3x6 Northern Dancer
4x4 Nearctic (through Northern Dancer & Icecapade)
5x5 Native Dancer (through Natalma & Shenanigans)

Same Dam as above
Proposed sire's stats=
27 Starts, 5 Wins, 2 Places, 4 Shows Career Earnings: $125,522
6% Stakes winners from foals/17% Stakes horses
At 2 In Ireland Won Orby E.B.F.Stakes, 3rd John Roarty Memorial E.B.F. Railway S.(Ire.G3) at 3 in Italy Won Premio Daumier

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Postby BJ » Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:59 pm

I should add...breeding to race.

User avatar
henthorn
Eclipse Champion
Posts: 2463
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Postby henthorn » Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:00 pm

I feel like my hands are tied behind my back on this one. I don't choose a mating based on one cross, unless it's to stay away from one that's too closely inbred. There are so many other factors that I am starting to appreciate lately, such as the female family and it's descendants, and what sires worked well with them. There are nicks for the sires and broodmare sires, and there are also apparent nicks for sirelines with the dams and second dams and their children (sibs and cousins of the mate in question). If you could give us the name of the horses in questions, either privately or on the forum, we could consider the cases with more comfort.
Rocking H

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Postby madelyn » Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:08 pm

What henthorn said...
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

Linda in TX
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: Manor Downs
Contact:

Postby Linda in TX » Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:16 pm

I agree with henthorn. The art of pedigree analysis is a lot like putting together a jigsaw puzzle or even handicapping a race. When it's completed, all the pieces (or most) fit together or all the data points to the best play. A smart person doesn't bet on a horse race with no more information than the names of the horses and their program number (yeah, I know. Many do - but the operative word was "smart"). So why would a smart person breed a horse without thoroughly examining every detail to try to determine the best possible outcome just as is done when handicapping? To make mating decisions any other way is simply "slappin' 'em together."

If you're going to breed horses based on the very limited criteria of a 4 x 4 to this horse or that, you might as well put the stallions' names in a hat and draw one out.