nicking

Discussion and analysis of thoroughbred stallions.

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn

Post Reply
Rahy85
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:15 pm

nicking

Postby Rahy85 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:32 pm

A comparison of TrueNicks and ENicks:

http://www.thoroughbredreview.com/nickingcomparison.htm
Top
User avatar
FOS
Freshman Sire
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:44 pm

Re: nicking

Postby FOS » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:04 pm

hi Rahy85

Rahy85 wrote:A comparison of TrueNicks and ENicks:

http://www.thoroughbredreview.com/nickingcomparison.htm

After having read the linked article titled Nicking Distributions and Comparative Usefulness...seems (to me anyway) a better title 8) may have been Nicking Distributions and Comparative Uselessness.

Respectfully
Top
Coaltown
Yearling
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:25 pm

Postby Coaltown » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:10 pm

Does anyone know what happened to the previous article on this website that was listing stallions believed to have fertility issues?
Top
User avatar
FOS
Freshman Sire
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:44 pm

Postby FOS » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:33 pm

hi Coaltown

Coaltown wrote:Does anyone know what happened to the previous article on this website that was listing stallions believed to have fertility issues?

Relatively close up (as of today) on the PQ Stallions forum page...there's a topic titled stallions with fertility/libido issues...

Hope that helps.

Respectfully
Top
LB
Eclipse Champion
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Kentucky

Postby LB » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:34 pm

Coaltown wrote:Does anyone know what happened to the previous article on this website that was listing stallions believed to have fertility issues?


I think it went into the circular file.
Top
Coaltown
Yearling
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:25 pm

Postby Coaltown » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:44 pm

I was actually talking about the article on the thoroughbred review website. They have a link to it in their article archives but nothing comes up when you hit on the link.
Top
mikec
Starters Handicap
Posts: 697
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:37 am
Location: New Jersey

Postby mikec » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:54 am

I believe the possibility of litigation persuaded them to remove the article.
Bring 'em back tired ; but bring 'em back sound !
Top
Tappiano
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:28 pm

Postby Tappiano » Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:18 am

I don't think that's the first time they've taken something down but I'd have to go back a number of years and scan a number of forums to see where the last "controversy" was. Seems there were a few people that do not like that person and they were really hitting at him hard.
Top
progenytest
Suckling
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:42 pm
Location: Australia

Re: nicking

Postby progenytest » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:26 pm

[quote="Rahy85"]A comparison of TrueNicks and ENicks:

http://www.thoroughbredreview.com/nickingcomparison.htm[/quote]

Spouting that garbage in Australia.

I have a mind to report it to the "Australian Securities & Investments Commission".

Receiving fees from stallion owners but not informing breeders.

You have to have a licence to be a "financial advisor" in Oz

Giving advice with no scientific/genetic base on stallions who's fee's are worth more than a house !!

Where's their disclaimer stating a vested position?

Who's their "QUALIFIED" genetist ?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Stallions”