Barrett's January

Talk about upcoming sales or auction results.

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn

tbrace
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 960
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:52 pm

Barrett's January

Postby tbrace » Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:57 am

Hi,
Anyone going to Barrett's Jan. sale? Anything interesting there?

Thanks!

User avatar
UmmYeah
Starters Handicap
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am

Postby UmmYeah » Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:45 pm

I'm not going, but I'd say that Hip No. 324 is, ummm, well, interesting to say the least...

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Postby Sam » Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:30 pm

UmmYeah wrote:I'm not going, but I'd say that Hip No. 324 is, ummm, well, interesting to say the least...

:shock: :x

WHAT THE @*(& :!:

Come on!, people should be penalized for breeding trash like that.

By unraced, out of unraced, out of unraced, out of unraced :?: :!: What the hell were they thinking?

User avatar
UmmYeah
Starters Handicap
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am

Postby UmmYeah » Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:12 pm

Be sure to note the ages of the sire and dam. This is a case of a yearling breeding to a yearling. There was a recent discussion on a different forum about this breeding. The consensus is that we *hope* it was a mistake. My big question is WHY WOULD BARRETT'S ACCEPT THIS COLT? It does them no favors, just makes them look bad, and I can't imagine that this horse will sell for much, if it even sells at all...

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Postby Sam » Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:37 pm

UmmYeah wrote:Be sure to note the ages of the sire and dam. This is a case of a yearling breeding to a yearling.

Oh hell, I totally missed that. I'm going to assume this was someone not seperating the yearlings fast enough.

You're right, I have to wonder what the people at Barretts were thinking when this one got approved.

Still, with the 2nd and 3rd dams being unraced and (not to disparage them) it being an Oregon bred, the owner would have been better off GIVING this thing away or keeping it for a stable pony.

This is just stupid

User avatar
Sysonby
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: California

Postby Sysonby » Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:01 pm

FWIW, I'll be there.

As for hip 324, Barretts January is not a select sale. Literally any TB can be sold at this sale. It's also not the first time this family was sold at Barretts. If I remember correctly, a full brother of the dam of this one sold as a two year old a couple of years ago for something like $1500 or so. He was an adorable little thing--He looked something like a child's hunter--and he was bought I think as a sporthorse. I remember him well because I looked at him, thinking that if he doesn't bring a bid I might take him home as a project but there was actually a small flurry of bids on him when he entered the ring. I guess everyone else thought the same thing. :wink:

User avatar
UmmYeah
Starters Handicap
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am

Postby UmmYeah » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:45 am

Well, good. Hopefully that little colt will end up going home with a good-hearted soul like yourself. I am drawn to runts and orphans, and I'd hate to hear about him falling into the hands of one of the bottom-feeders that gravitate towards the cheap and unsold horses at these auctions.

As for horses that interest me for a different reason, I'm curious about Hips 151 and 263. Any thoughts on what those two might go for?

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Postby Sam » Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:14 pm

UmmYeah wrote:As for horses that interest me for a different reason, I'm curious about Hips 151 and 263. Any thoughts on what those two might go for?

263 will be on the cheap. $10k or less. General Meeting is still pretty cold. The mare only placed at 2 and never hit the board in 3 starts at 3. The mare has two half sibs who both won so she's the weak branch. You have to go back to technically the 3rd dam to find black type and thats only because the 3rd dam is a sister to a black type mare who produced a black type. I'd pass entirely.

151 should get to $25k, maybe even $30k. Lost Soldier is selling well and the family is pretty solid. First foal from an unraced dam and all but two of the sibs who started were winners -- half of those were stakes horses. Hard to ignore that. Funny thing, the second dam -- Littlebitapleasure -- only had one other sister -- Miracle Cure. Everything she (Miracle Cure) produced won as well so even if they aren't stakes horses, the 2nd 3rd dams are getting decent runners and there's every reason to believe this one will be and get runners as well. I wouldn't be surprised to see someone try to flip her in the 2yo-i-t sale next year for a healthy sum. Pinhookers dream mare this one.

User avatar
UmmYeah
Starters Handicap
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am

Postby UmmYeah » Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:57 pm

Thanks Sam. I agree. 151 is definitely more attractive. 520 is another that could be a pinhooker's dream--it's a yearling that won't even be 9 months old at the time of the sale...

User avatar
Nijinsky
Allowance Winner
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 5:40 pm
Location: California

Postby Nijinsky » Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:50 pm

If there is one thing I have learned after several years going to the sales, is conformation and size will out sell a poor pedigree and a badly conformed horse with a great page will not sell well at all.

Sire power, conformation and size are what buyers are looking for.

Sam there is really no way to tell how either of the horses mentioned will sell for until they are inspected.

User avatar
Sysonby
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: California

Postby Sysonby » Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:20 pm

Nijinsky wrote:If there is one thing I have learned after several years going to the sales, is conformation and size will out sell a poor pedigree and a badly conformed horse with a great page will not sell well at all.

Sire power, conformation and size are what buyers are looking for.

Sam there is really no way to tell how either of the horses mentioned will sell for until they are inspected.


I completely agree. At the October sale, a General Meeting colt out of an unraced half sister to a minor SP winner went for $80,000 but a full sister to Chief Planner RNA'd at $47,000. Looking at the page alone, you'd never predict that.

tbrace
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 960
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:52 pm

Barrett's

Postby tbrace » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:26 pm

We are looking for a mare or two. What do you think of 411 and 455? Assuming they are good individuals, that is?

User avatar
Nijinsky
Allowance Winner
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 5:40 pm
Location: California

Postby Nijinsky » Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:44 am

Here are a few tips I look for in buying a mare and have done pretty good so far with my mares.....all have produce winners. Mind you I did not get all these qualities in my mares....for the prices I am willing to spend. I may have to forfeit one or more of these qualites. Usually just one.

This is what I look for when looking at a catalog or pedigree.

1) How old is the mare ? I personally like them young. Does she have many females in the family that will hopefully help improve the pedigree?

2) Is she by a leading broodmare sire or a possible upcomming leading broodmare sire ?

3 Was she an above average runner. Did she win at two or at least came in 1st, 2nd or 3rd in her first few starts, showing she had talent ? I usually buy mares who haven't produced yet...so they are young. Buying claiming mares who were very talented SW or SPW's , but because of injuries or whatever have dropped in class therefore I can claim them really cheap.

4) Must have black type under first two dams or I automatically pass.
Stay away from cheap black type...not all black type is created equal. A stakes at Turf Paradise isn't the same as a Stakes at Del Mar, Santa Anita or even Bay Meadows or Golden Gate.

5) Is the mare a quality producer ? A mare who is considered a bad luck mare I pass on....dead foals, barron, aborted, more than one of these I stay away from.

6) Consistant quality earners throughout pedigree...SSI of 2.00 or more in several of the siblings in each generation in pedigree. APR will tell you this info.

7) Is the mare in foal on an early enough cover to a leading sire...so I can resell the foal and make a profit !

8 When buying a mare if you are a market breeder always look at her page...then picture the page as it would look if you were selling her foal. It takes on a whole new look when the 2nd dam who looked so good on her page now is the 3rd dam and doesn't look so good.

Of course this all I look for from just the page...then you have conformation, temperment, bad habits, health and other things to consider.
Last edited by Nijinsky on Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ruffian
Starters Handicap
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:52 am
Location: UK/USA

Postby Ruffian » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:46 am

I totally agree with you on the picturing the page for HER foal (particularly useful sometimes as her foal is actually in the sale, so it's already printed for you :D ) It makes the page look so different.

Good points Nijinsky and ones that should be used often.

:wink:

Georgerz
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Maple Valley, Washington

Postby Georgerz » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:36 pm

The number 2 recommendation makes no sense at all.