Thoughts on the Triple Crown

General racing discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

User avatar
bdw0617
Darley line
Posts: 9206
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Postby bdw0617 » Thu May 21, 2009 4:46 pm

Aug27 wrote:This is almost too funny. Someone wrote on an earlier thread about how great a trainer Frank Whiteley was, in comparison to Asmussen.

Let's put this in context of the current discussion re. entering horses to exclude Rachel:
Whiteley is the fellow who entered his rabbit (Hedevar) against Dr Fager to help set up the race's pace so his closer (Damascus) had a chance. How is that (entering a rabbit) any different than entering multiple horses to exclude their most feared opponent? Either it's fair or it isn't. If not, than no one should be able to enter more than one horse in a race (trainer or owner). Talk about double standards.

Some trainers and owners will go to any lengths to win. Drugs, doping, milkshakes, vet's magic elixir ... you name it. Odd how we haven't heard much about Jeff Mullins on the national scene since he was busted in New York, isn't it?

As far as RA goes, it was the Preakness. Not the Derby. Big difference, IMO. I wonder if she'd had to face the boys in compiling sufficient graded earnings in order to get into the Derby and run there, if she'd still have enough left in the tank to run like she did in the Preakness. Of course, that's just conjecture; we'll never know. She was clearly best last Saturday.

Still a lot of racing to come this year. Sure hope she's not retired early, with one of those mystery injuries ... Glad Jess Jackson hasn't displayed a tendency to that kind of behavior in the past.



umm.. it's different becuase even though Whtiney entered the rabbit.. dr fager got a chance to prove himself.
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein

ASB
Starters Handicap
Posts: 558
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 4:45 pm

Postby ASB » Thu May 21, 2009 5:03 pm

Not to mention that I said nothing of it being "fair" or "unfair". It's just incredibly bad sportsmanship, of which the conspiring group admitted to once they had a change of "heart" after being slammed in the press and in industry circles.

Give your horse the best chance to run his race, but don't exclude other horses because you want to duck, especially in the TC races. Come on!

ASB
Starters Handicap
Posts: 558
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 4:45 pm

Postby ASB » Thu May 21, 2009 5:07 pm

Hey Bdw, you build websites, don't you? Check out the "would this make sense to anyone else" thread in the general forum. Maybe you can give a perspective from a content logistics point of view.

User avatar
bdw0617
Darley line
Posts: 9206
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Postby bdw0617 » Thu May 21, 2009 5:17 pm

sure do

black17media.com
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”

- Einstein

User avatar
Vicbrenan
Suckling
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:08 pm
Location: Belleville

Postby Vicbrenan » Thu May 21, 2009 7:27 pm

hmm sorry... But I dont think RA ruined the TC by winning the preakness... As others have said, she entered and won fair and square... And MTB simply did not win. And to me, the true TC winner should be winning it no matter who he/she races against...

I dont want to see this sport turn into something fake based on how people want things to play out.

It needs to be real, the horses need to race, and in the end there is either a winner or there isn't.
www.handsonequine.net
Equine Massage, Rehabilitation & Horse training

User avatar
Twingirl
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:01 am
Location: Ouachita Mountains, AR

Postby Twingirl » Fri May 22, 2009 1:56 am

My emotional self is with Karen.
My practical side is with BDW.

:D

I sure would feel a little better if RA runs in the Belmont.

Otherwise, I kinda wonder why Jackson would just enter her in "one" TC race....it's sort of an odd thing to do in a race that is a SERIES race.

I guess to me, if the horses don't race in it as a series, then it's just another race.

Please explain to me HOW we'll ever have another Triple Crown winner if the connections all just enter their horses in "one" of the TC races :roll: ?
I mean, what if everyone just did that?

May as well just make them separate races, like the Travers, instead of keeping them a series.

User avatar
Twingirl
Maiden Special Weight
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:01 am
Location: Ouachita Mountains, AR

Postby Twingirl » Fri May 22, 2009 1:58 am

Vicbrenan wrote:It needs to be real, the horses need to race, and in the end there is either a winner or there isn't.


How can it be "real" if the connections just "cherry pick" one race out of the 3 race series?

I don't expect to ever see another TC winner in my lifetime, and this is just another reason I won't..

Aug27
Allowance Winner
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:29 am

Postby Aug27 » Fri May 22, 2009 3:59 am

Owners & trainers enter multiple horses in a given race in order to increase their likelihood of winning. It is that simple. (And obvious ... to me anyway.) I guess it was poor sportsmanship for all of those multiple horse entries in the Derby over the years: Grindstone/Editors Note, General Challenge/Excellent Meeting, etc.

If they want to give themselves the best shot of winning the Belmont, MTB's connections ought to enter a rabbit, in order to ensure an honest pace. We've seen the Commendable and Da Tara (and others) runnings, where lone speed steals it on the front end. Mike Smith said he thinks MTB can win the Belmont with the right pace scenario. I think the unspoken thought being they can't let RA lope along uncontested on the front end.

User avatar
wangkw
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 969
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:48 am
Location: Singapore -- Small, Solid Island In Dictatorship

Postby wangkw » Fri May 22, 2009 4:49 am

Twingirl wrote:
Vicbrenan wrote:It needs to be real, the horses need to race, and in the end there is either a winner or there isn't.


How can it be "real" if the connections just "cherry pick" one race out of the 3 race series?

I don't expect to ever see another TC winner in my lifetime, and this is just another reason I won't..


Should expect to see a TC in lifetime..unless you are very senior. :oops: :oops: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Image
Our Greatest Glory Is Not In Never Falling But In Rising Everytime We Fall

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Postby madelyn » Fri May 22, 2009 5:35 am

The history of the TC is full of horses who didn't run in all three. It is also full of multiple entries by a single owner/trainer. What happened in the 70's to permit the TC to be won Three Times In One Decade?

I don't think "sportsmanship" is really a major factor in deciding to run your horse in a race worth over a mil if you think the horse is ready and can win. Jess Jackson purchase Rachel Alexandra to run her in the Preakness and beyond, and as a significant addition to his broodmare band. His money, his horse, his right to do so. Look how many TC's have been "ruined" by another horse.
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Fri May 22, 2009 5:49 am

madelyn wrote:The history of the TC is full of horses who didn't run in all three. It is also full of multiple entries by a single owner/trainer. What happened in the 70's to permit the TC to be won Three Times In One Decade?

I don't think "sportsmanship" is really a major factor in deciding to run your horse in a race worth over a mil if you think the horse is ready and can win. Jess Jackson purchase Rachel Alexandra to run her in the Preakness and beyond, and as a significant addition to his broodmare band. His money, his horse, his right to do so. Look how many TC's have been "ruined" by another horse.


Yeah we could've had Sham gunning for the TC if it wasn't for that darn Secretariat horse.

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Postby madelyn » Fri May 22, 2009 6:05 am

... or Alydar if only he was not born the same year as Affirmed.
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Fri May 22, 2009 6:31 am

[quote="madelyn"]... or Alydar if only he was not born the same year as Affirmed.[/quote

Easy Goer or Sunday Silence, like you say the list could go on and on.

User avatar
madelyn
Moderator
Posts: 10067
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Postby madelyn » Fri May 22, 2009 6:36 am

I think Mine That Bird's sire, Birdstone, ruined the TC for Smarty Jones that year...
So Run for the Roses, as fast as you can.....

oliverstoned
Restricted Stakes Winner
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Florida

Postby oliverstoned » Fri May 22, 2009 7:30 am

madelyn wrote:I think Mine That Bird's sire, Birdstone, ruined the TC for Smarty Jones that year...

Sure did got booed in the winners circle. Victory Gallop ruins Real Quiet by a nose, a nose!
Two I wish, deserved and were worthy to win the TC are Spectacular Bid and Native Dancer.