hi horsenuts...hi guys
horsenuts wrote:Steve Haskins was and is EXACTLY right calling Nafzger out with his off-handed remarks about "why" regarding running in the Belmont.
Seems to me that Nafzger tried to put his best spin on his/Tafel's decision to skip the Belmont, but his best was apparently not good enough. Furthermore, arguably his comments/spin did NOT sit well with some (if not many) including Haskins. Nafzger is taking the heat for his comments (and decision), but I still don't expect him to specifically say what I believe that he believes is the reality...that he doesn't like Street Senses's chances (in the Belmont), and might actually be concerned that the colt could throw in a stinker (going a mile and a half). The result...Nafzger/Tafel will
take a pass on the Belmont.
Seems (to me anyway) that Nafzger's attempt to spin/downplay (whatever) the defection of Street Sense (from the Belmont) has all but backfired, and might have actually affected (in the wrong way) the perception (by some) of his colt.
I had my doubts before...but Nafzger (as a result of his comments, attempt at spin etc) is convincing me that Street Sense is NOT good enough to win the Belmont.
Regardless...
horsenuts, if I may ask, would you run your 2-yo Champion and Kentucky Derby winner in the Belmont (after losing by a slim margin in the Preakness) if you didn't have the confidence that he could win, coupled with a sense that he might be soundly defeated (and possibly embarrased) to boot?
Just an opinion...but I sense that Nafzger feels that way (about SS)...so why risk it?
horsenuts wrote:But KUDOS to Steve Assmussen and the Curlin camp WHO KNOW what horseracings great traditions truly are (thank goodness there's still some appreciation for American racing's ultimate achievement, the TC races).
I might tip my hat...but won't offer a whole lot more than that. With that in mind...I would suggest that if Team Curlin felt the same about their colt's chances (and had concerns of possible embarrassment) in the Belmont that I sense Team Street Sense feels about their colt...it would not surprise me if they too might announce that they'd be skipping the race. An indicator (that that might be the case) could be (although certainly it was a different situation) Satish Sanan's (one of Curlin's owners) arguably conservative decision (also questioned by some) to NOT try/test (even once) his undefeated 2-yo eclipse winner Vindication, as a three-year-old. Yes, Vindication reportedly had an issue and was sidelined (after his four starts as a two-year-old) but reports were (week after week and month after month) that the colt would be fine (to race) and would run at three.
When it got down to the real nitty gritty though...seems that Sanan disseminated his brand of spin. The spin sounded (to me anyway) like Sanan simply didn't want to take the chance that his colt might get beat. If he did (get beat) his marketers would no longer be able to boast that the colt retired undefeated (allbeit 4 wins from 4 starts).
I would argue that Sanan did what he felt was in his best interest. Certainly he was entitled, after all, it was his colt...his valuable racehorse/asset to manage as he saw fit. Is that really a whole lot different than Nafzger/Tafel doing what they believe is in their best interest (that being, skip the Belmont).
All that aside...I am confident that Team Curlin (including Sanan) believes that their colt is certainly good enough to win the Belmont. I also sense that Team Curlin is EXTREMELY confident that (whether he wins it or not) Curlin will NOT throw in a stinker.
Best to you.
Respectfully