RIP Maria's Mon
Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
Poor Maven....less Lady Be Good blood to go around next year.
What synthetics are to California racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
Rokeby Forever wrote:Poor Maven....less Lady Be Good blood to go around next year.
Ain't that the truth. You know, this is one where I told myself I would breed to him in the next few years but always kept pushing it off, because I wanted to ride his "good crops" into the sales ring. Typical.
Don't be so humble - you are not that great.
hi guys
When Maria's Mon was retired to Pin Oak (to first stand for an advertised stud fee of $7,500, if I recall correctly), he was all but scoffed and/or snickered at (as a stallion prospect) by some. Arguably, the fact that he was sired by Wavering Monarch had a cooling (if not chilling) affect (if you will) on many commercial breeders; many that might have otherwise bred to/supported the multiple G1-winning 2-year-old champion, if he had been by a sire with more commercial appeal/pizazz connected to him.
Funny thing is...that as much as being sired by Wavering Monarch likely had a cooling/chilling affect of sorts (at least to some degree) on him early-on (at stud), I wouldn't be surprised if some (if not many) breeders today didn't even know who Maria's Mon was by (with certainty, and without multiple guesses and/or choices).
Regardless...what a VERY nice horse; deserving of respect for what he accomplished both as a racehorse, and as a racehorse sire.
Respectfully
When Maria's Mon was retired to Pin Oak (to first stand for an advertised stud fee of $7,500, if I recall correctly), he was all but scoffed and/or snickered at (as a stallion prospect) by some. Arguably, the fact that he was sired by Wavering Monarch had a cooling (if not chilling) affect (if you will) on many commercial breeders; many that might have otherwise bred to/supported the multiple G1-winning 2-year-old champion, if he had been by a sire with more commercial appeal/pizazz connected to him.
Funny thing is...that as much as being sired by Wavering Monarch likely had a cooling/chilling affect of sorts (at least to some degree) on him early-on (at stud), I wouldn't be surprised if some (if not many) breeders today didn't even know who Maria's Mon was by (with certainty, and without multiple guesses and/or choices).
Regardless...what a VERY nice horse; deserving of respect for what he accomplished both as a racehorse, and as a racehorse sire.
Respectfully
Sire Line
Sad to see him go but it should not have come as a complete surprise when one checks Marias Mon tail-male line. They as a rule have not been blessed with much longevity. There may just be something to this gene thing.
1.) Marias Mon (1993 to 2007) age 14 and 1/2 years (???)
2.) Wavering Monarch (1979 to 2004) age 25 years (normal)
3.) Majestic Light (1973 to 2000) age 17 years (colic)
4.) Majestic Prince (1966 to 1981) age 15 years (heart attack)
5.) Raise a Native (1961 to 1988) age 27 years (normal)
6.) Native Dancer (1950 to 1967) age 17 years (colic)
7.) Polynesian (1942 to 1959) age 17 years (colic)
1.) Marias Mon (1993 to 2007) age 14 and 1/2 years (???)
2.) Wavering Monarch (1979 to 2004) age 25 years (normal)
3.) Majestic Light (1973 to 2000) age 17 years (colic)
4.) Majestic Prince (1966 to 1981) age 15 years (heart attack)
5.) Raise a Native (1961 to 1988) age 27 years (normal)
6.) Native Dancer (1950 to 1967) age 17 years (colic)
7.) Polynesian (1942 to 1959) age 17 years (colic)
You know, Pat, I really think there's a lot to be discovered with genetics-- longevity, class, production trends.
A legendary breeder once told me that he would never buy or keep a foal by a dominant stallion, if it wasn't the same color as the stallion. Call it foolery, but he had results... and funny enough, all his horses looked the same.
I know an example my dad and consultant both cited (separately) was that of looking for some white in the tail of any Cox's Ridge line horse. They were always the runners/producers.
A legendary breeder once told me that he would never buy or keep a foal by a dominant stallion, if it wasn't the same color as the stallion. Call it foolery, but he had results... and funny enough, all his horses looked the same.
I know an example my dad and consultant both cited (separately) was that of looking for some white in the tail of any Cox's Ridge line horse. They were always the runners/producers.
Don't be so humble - you are not that great.
Cox's Ridge
Wasn't Cox's Ridge a Rabicano with the white ticking in the flanks and "skunk" or "coontail" rings of white hair in the tail head? Anyone know the gentics on Rabicano inheritance?
- Intrinsic Worth
- Starters Handicap
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:27 pm
Maven wrote:You know, Pat, I really think there's a lot to be discovered with genetics-- longevity, class, production trends.
A legendary breeder once told me that he would never buy or keep a foal by a dominant stallion, if it wasn't the same color as the stallion. Call it foolery, but he had results... and funny enough, all his horses looked the same.
I know an example my dad and consultant both cited (separately) was that of looking for some white in the tail of any Cox's Ridge line horse. They were always the runners/producers.
In the breed of dog I show (scotties) we have a database of dogs who are 11 and older. They are trying to track the families that produce long lived dogs. Our old dog (soon to be 13) came from what seems to be a long lived line. His sire died at 15 1/2 and his grand sire died at 14 1/2.
All men are equal on the turf - or under it.
-
xfactor fan
- Breeder's Cup Winner
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:46 pm
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
- geowarrior
- Leading Sire
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:45 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
-
JCBloodstock
- Maiden Special Weight
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:19 pm
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Nice,nice stallion and a travesty to the industry.And even at a $7500 stud fee they were still selective in what they bred to him and if you didn't have one that they thought would nick with him,you didn't breed to him for no price.
Perhaps that is why this son of Wavering Monarch defied the odd's of success in the breeding shed !!!
Perhaps that is why this son of Wavering Monarch defied the odd's of success in the breeding shed !!!
