Santa Anita: hell in a handbasket
Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster
- bdw0617
- Darley line
- Posts: 9206
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Santa Anita: hell in a handbasket
My gut told me, you know...."I know you love the winter santa anita meet, but just hold off for a ocuple of days at least to see how the track was playing"
let's backtrack a little. about a year and a half ago was it, everyone was complaining about how many breakdowns there were and how DIRT was the probem. yes DIRT. so CHRB mandates all tracks be synthetic tracks.
let's see... I actually kinda like hollywood. I would be lying otherwise... it's about as close to a real dirt race as you are gonna get. although ti's not better than the dirt hollywood park.
Del mar is a cluster@@@@. no other word to describe it.
but if the first 4 races at Santa Anita are any indication, it might end up being the worst F up of all.
Either over the last I dont' know wha.t. 48 hours, every trainer learned how to cut 3 seconds off his horses time, or the track is playing deally fast.
aren't fast times. these are times that make Santa Anita Dirt track look SLOW.
Race 1, 5 and a half furlongs maiden SW..
ho hum....TRACK RECORD... 1:02 and 1.
IN race 2, either i just saw the reincarnation of Ghostzapper in the vosbrough, or the track is playing stupid fast.. 7 furlongs in 1:20 and 1.
IN persecptive, DReam Rush won a grade 1 at belmont, and did it well, in 1:22 and 2. that's a grade 1 race. this is a non graded stakes.
we move on to a slow time, 6F MSW in 1:09
and in the 5th race we all know mid level claimers can run 6F in 1:08 and 3
Just stop. santa anita you can't mess with the track anymore. it went from fast, to faster to deathly fast every time you "tinker" with the track. unless you are uninstalling it, leave it alone. I'm frighted to see what else might become of your tinkering.
let's backtrack a little. about a year and a half ago was it, everyone was complaining about how many breakdowns there were and how DIRT was the probem. yes DIRT. so CHRB mandates all tracks be synthetic tracks.
let's see... I actually kinda like hollywood. I would be lying otherwise... it's about as close to a real dirt race as you are gonna get. although ti's not better than the dirt hollywood park.
Del mar is a cluster@@@@. no other word to describe it.
but if the first 4 races at Santa Anita are any indication, it might end up being the worst F up of all.
Either over the last I dont' know wha.t. 48 hours, every trainer learned how to cut 3 seconds off his horses time, or the track is playing deally fast.
aren't fast times. these are times that make Santa Anita Dirt track look SLOW.
Race 1, 5 and a half furlongs maiden SW..
ho hum....TRACK RECORD... 1:02 and 1.
IN race 2, either i just saw the reincarnation of Ghostzapper in the vosbrough, or the track is playing stupid fast.. 7 furlongs in 1:20 and 1.
IN persecptive, DReam Rush won a grade 1 at belmont, and did it well, in 1:22 and 2. that's a grade 1 race. this is a non graded stakes.
we move on to a slow time, 6F MSW in 1:09
and in the 5th race we all know mid level claimers can run 6F in 1:08 and 3
Just stop. santa anita you can't mess with the track anymore. it went from fast, to faster to deathly fast every time you "tinker" with the track. unless you are uninstalling it, leave it alone. I'm frighted to see what else might become of your tinkering.
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein
- Einstein
-
magic code
- Starters Handicap
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 9:32 am
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
At least he won. The one that broke down today at Golden Gate didn't finish or earn anything.magic code wrote:1 winner was vanned off. No picture for those owners.
What synthetics are to California racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
Rokeby Forever wrote:The one that broke down today at Golden Gate didn't finish or earn anything.
What was the horse's name? Which race please?
Thank you.
Last edited by NorthStar on Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Hold Your Peace
- Allowance Winner
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:12 am
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
- bdw0617
- Darley line
- Posts: 9206
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:19 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Rokeby Forever wrote:See Ageecee's comment, North Star.
Johnny Eves has never run in a stake - when did Grade 1 racing become a test of whether or not a horse could handle a surface? This is NOT what racing at the highest levels is meant to be.
roke is 200% right.
Horse saftey is the most important issue ovbiusly. but a close second is the handicapability of the races. People seem to forget how horse racing actually makes it's bread and butter...BETTORS!!
I don't think it's any considence that hollywood park had the best revenue numbers of the last 3 meets, they have the most consistant playing track.
I have options as a bettor. dozens. from a handicapping perspective, the In summations and jhonny eves of hte world don't belong in grade 1 races, and winning a grade 1 race shouldn't be "okay, who is going ot take to the track"
del mar turned races into a race of onw who was actually the best horse, but of who had the most endurance. not the same
Santa Anita is doing the opposite. races are over at the half mile pole.
"When the solution is simple, God is answering.”
- Einstein
- Einstein
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
This one today, North Star:
http://equibase.com/static/chart/pdf/GG122607USA7.pdf
http://equibase.com/static/chart/pdf/GG122607USA7.pdf