Here is mine in order
Best
1 Kiaran McLaughlin- IMO just the best right now
2 Barclay Tagg- real deal horseman
3 Marty Wolfson- he knows what he is doing
4 Bobby Frankel- one of the best if not the best of all time
5 Allen Jerkins- he is a legend
6 Bill Mott- loaded to have a monster year
7 Graham Motion- solid across the board
8 Michael Trombetta- this guy is sharp
9 Tom Amoss- runs a very good operation
10 Bryan Lynch- he is on his way & life is easy with a barnful of Adena's best
Notice I left out Dutrow, Mitchell etc these guys are great at moving horses up however they do it but I just wanted to list more real horseman
Worst
1 Jamie Sanders- how can anyone be more horriable than her
2 Jason Orman- should go back to hockey or whatever he did before
3 D Wayne Lukas- king of mismanaging racing careers
4 Eric Guillot- nobody ig going to as little with as much
5 Gary Mandella- he is not Papa Mandella for sure
6 Ralph Nicks- why cant he figure it out? he has worked with the best
7 Tim Ritchey- read too many Tom Ivers books he probley should be higher on this list
8 Mark Glatt- I always throw his horses out
9 Sean McCarthy- should be thankful for HRTV
10 Todd Pletcher- alot of people may have him on the best list but he is not a very good trainer IMO
Top 10 Best/Worst Trainers?
Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster
TomFool
I believe that when we discuss top trainers we must consider that racing has many levels of competition, and it is only fair to judge good horsemen/horsewomen according to the level that they participate, unless of course you are only talking about the top level. If a trainer is only dealing with blueblooded horses we expect him or her to do well. Along those same lines, how do you determine success in terms of best/worst, money earned, stakes races won, winning percentage, in the money percentage, or whathaveyou. If you consider all of the factors, I think your top 10 would require some editing.
DDT
I believe that when we discuss top trainers we must consider that racing has many levels of competition, and it is only fair to judge good horsemen/horsewomen according to the level that they participate, unless of course you are only talking about the top level. If a trainer is only dealing with blueblooded horses we expect him or her to do well. Along those same lines, how do you determine success in terms of best/worst, money earned, stakes races won, winning percentage, in the money percentage, or whathaveyou. If you consider all of the factors, I think your top 10 would require some editing.
DDT
-
imnumberjuan
- Allowance Winner
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
I concur DDT, there are excellent trainers, who remain at the local circuits for whatever reason, be it lifestyle, ambition what have you.
I think "worst" trainers could be split into a couple of categories. First you could have the overhyped trainer, followed by the career year in and year out 2% trainer that works such locales as Walla Walla, Grand Forks, Evergreen Park, Marquis Downs etc. (as one acquantance refers to them as the people couldn't train a dog to #@$&, nevermind a horse to run.).
I think "worst" trainers could be split into a couple of categories. First you could have the overhyped trainer, followed by the career year in and year out 2% trainer that works such locales as Walla Walla, Grand Forks, Evergreen Park, Marquis Downs etc. (as one acquantance refers to them as the people couldn't train a dog to #@$&, nevermind a horse to run.).
Gotta keep on Keepin on - Joe Dirt
-
going4stamina
- Allowance Winner
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:07 pm
-
Rokeby Forever
- Darley line
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: Reno, NV
Allen Jerkens is the best trainer that ever lived. For 50 years, he's won stakes with horses that weren't worth a ham sandwich.
I worked for one of the best (IMO), and he used to say, "Allen Jerkens is in a class by himself." That's good enough for me.
Nobody has the creativity and understanding of a horse as an individual as does Allen Jerkens. I used to hear stories out of that barn that made me laugh like crazy, but everything that man ever did had a purpose and it worked.
There are a lot of good trainers out there today, but NOBODY takes a top spot over Allen Jerkens.
Tom Fool - how did Jimmy Jerkens not make your list? He trains EXACTLY like his old man...doesn't the job of converting Corinthian from headcase to G1 and BC Mile winner convince you of that?
One of the most unheralded trainers around is Lynn Whiting. That man can flat out train a racehorse. I think John Servis is a heck of a trainer, too.
Tom Amoss is NO horseman - he's sharp and he wins races and he places his horses properly, but a horse is cooked by the time he gets done with it.
I worked for one of the best (IMO), and he used to say, "Allen Jerkens is in a class by himself." That's good enough for me.
Nobody has the creativity and understanding of a horse as an individual as does Allen Jerkens. I used to hear stories out of that barn that made me laugh like crazy, but everything that man ever did had a purpose and it worked.
There are a lot of good trainers out there today, but NOBODY takes a top spot over Allen Jerkens.
Tom Fool - how did Jimmy Jerkens not make your list? He trains EXACTLY like his old man...doesn't the job of converting Corinthian from headcase to G1 and BC Mile winner convince you of that?
One of the most unheralded trainers around is Lynn Whiting. That man can flat out train a racehorse. I think John Servis is a heck of a trainer, too.
Tom Amoss is NO horseman - he's sharp and he wins races and he places his horses properly, but a horse is cooked by the time he gets done with it.
What synthetics are to California racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gb0mxcpPOU
You need to put Jack Van Berg on that top list, no horses lately but if nothing else his past and this:
http://www.fallight.com/entry/ROID-TO-TROUBLE
http://www.fallight.com/entry/ROID-TO-TROUBLE
- Intrinsic Worth
- Starters Handicap
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:27 pm
- Barn 31 T-breds
- 2yo Maiden
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:35 pm
- Location: NJ
To me Matz is the most over rated 10% trainer out there.
Westover, Bell had a pretty rough year in '07, not sure how he will bounce back.
Lynch is a great guy and it's good to see him doing well, I also agree whoever mentioned Clement, he may be tabbed strictly as a turf trainer but he is damn solid, and pretty funny to boot, like Lynch.
Maybe we should start a thread about trainers who win and are fun to be around and those who are miserable bastards and are mediocre.
Westover, Bell had a pretty rough year in '07, not sure how he will bounce back.
Lynch is a great guy and it's good to see him doing well, I also agree whoever mentioned Clement, he may be tabbed strictly as a turf trainer but he is damn solid, and pretty funny to boot, like Lynch.
Maybe we should start a thread about trainers who win and are fun to be around and those who are miserable bastards and are mediocre.
too weird to live...too rare to die
www.ascotstudfarm.com
www.ascotstudfarm.com
- geowarrior
- Leading Sire
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:45 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA