Chestnut Color- Dominant or Recessive

General on-topic discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

Mel
Newborn
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:48 am

Chestnut Color- Dominant or Recessive

Postby Mel » Sun Jun 05, 2005 12:27 am

Had a chestnut filly born the other day. The mare is bay and the stallion is bay. Does anyone know if chestnut coloring is dominant or recessive?

Three years ago, the mare had a chestnut filly by a chestnut stallion.

Thanks for your help.

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Postby Sam » Sun Jun 05, 2005 12:36 am

I believe it is recessive, but that it can be carried by a bay horse. So if you have two bays that both carry it, they can have a chestnut foal.

hpkingjr
Moderator
Posts: 1176
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 6:11 am
Location: KY

Charting Chestnuts

Postby hpkingjr » Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:51 am

Sam wrote:I believe it is recessive, but that it can be carried by a bay horse. So if you have two bays that both carry it, they can have a chestnut foal.

Chestnut based horses - "??ee"
Includes Chestnut, sorrel, palomino, cremello, gold champagne, flaxen sorrel, sorrel/white, etc.

We already know that a chestnut based horse is always going to be "ee" so we have that genotype. What is at the "bay" gene pair is a mystery. You may be able to determine some info from foals and ancestry.

Ancestry -- If the chestnut horse had a black parent than he must carry at least one "a" - if both parents were black based then the horses genotype is "aaee". If both parents are chestnut based it makes it much more difficult. You can go back another generation to find any black or bay based horses to figure out the odds of "a" or "A" - but as soon as the chestnut base is introduced you have no way of knowing "for sure".

For example your horses sire is chestnut, but his sire and dam were both black. You could then determine that the horses sire was aaee and that he would have contributed the "a" to your horse and therefore you have "a?ee".

If one of the parents was bay, the odds of your chestnut carrying "A" is increased, but since a bay can be "Aa" there is no guarantee that the bay passed the "A" to your horse.

Foals -- If you have had foals out of your chestnut horse you may be able to determine genotype that way.

Foaling History:
1) Chestnut had a black when bred to a black or bay - genotype is "a?ee"
2) Chestnut had a bay when bred to a black - genotype is "A?ee"
3) Chestnut had a black when bred to a bay - genotype is "a?ee"

If your horse produces both 1 and 2 or your horse produces 2 and has a black parent you would know its genotype is "Aaee".
Hope this makes sense for you.

User avatar
camohn
Starters Handicap
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:58 am
Location: Lancaster, PA

Postby camohn » Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:34 am

In short summary........yes chestnut is recessive and you need 2 copies to get a chestnut foal. :wink:

User avatar
Jorge
Moderator
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:48 pm

Postby Jorge » Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:43 am

The great SECRETARIAT (1970) is good example of a chestnut coming from non-chestnut immediate parents.

As per two chestnut parents throwing a chestnut foal that occurs theoretically 100% percent of the time. When two chestnut parents don't throw a chestnut foal it is because an error occurred in wrongly registering that foal as a non-chestnut when actually he was one.

The other scenario is when a sabino white foal is born from two chestnut parents like was the case of WAR COLORS, who was foaled 1963. Again, in this case there is no error for that foal looks white outside, but, actually, he is a genuine subjecent chestnut.




where the subjacent non-perceived color

rds
Weanling
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: NM but recently and still partially in CA

How about gray

Postby rds » Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:25 am

One of these day's I'm going to pick up a book on color genetics, but for now, I'll just ask :?

So what is the story when you get a gray foal from 2 bay parents?

parlo
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 9:36 am
Location: Germany

Postby parlo » Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:42 am

Have You a living example for that, because this would be a singularity in thoroughbred-breeding? Theory says that when a foal is grey at least one parent must be also a grey horse.

User avatar
Karie
Grade III Winner
Posts: 1143
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Livonia, Michigan
Contact:

Postby Karie » Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:49 am

hmmm.. last year I my chestnut mare (with a blaze and 4 socks) had a bay filly from a Grey stallion and this year was bred to a Dk. Bay Quarter horse and had a LIGHT chestnut filly. She is an Appendix Quarter horse and would probably be registered as a Dun.. but the kicker is that the Quarter horse filly has blue eyes! wierd.....

rds
Weanling
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: NM but recently and still partially in CA

Maybe gray foal

Postby rds » Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:57 am

I think I might... I have a filly who looks like she might be gray. Was a late April foal, so it's still early. Her Dam is by a gray sire, but is a bay herself, and the sire is a bay. The filly is kind of a taupe color and is showing some definite gray tints.

LSB
Grade II Winner
Posts: 1465
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: Kentucky

Postby LSB » Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 am

rds, in order for your filly to be grey, she must have a grey parent. If she does turn grey, you should do a paternity test on her.

Karie, the grey stallion that sired the bay filly you had last year must have had a base color of bay. (Grey isn't a color, it's a pattern or an overlay on top of the horse's color.)

rds
Weanling
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: NM but recently and still partially in CA

Postby rds » Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:31 am

I kinda thought that was true.

Well since she was mated to my Stallion, in my "back yard" - I guess she's just going to be a weird colored bay! No doubt about the Sire.

louis finochio
Darley line
Posts: 9181
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Alhambra-Calif.
Contact:

Postby louis finochio » Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:46 pm

Pay attention to the color of the superior runners are the SR bay or ch.?

The colors are the key to the superior runners as they inherit those genes that make them head and shoulders above the other colors.
Those without sin cast the first stone.
Louis Finochio

Sam
Chef de Race: Intermediate
Posts: 4194
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:51 pm

Postby Sam » Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:26 pm

louis finochio wrote:Pay attention to the color of the superior runners are the SR bay or ch.?

The colors are the key to the superior runners as they inherit those genes that make them head and shoulders above the other colors.

blink

:?

double blink

jaw falls open .. snaps shut.

head shake


That's like betting on a horse because his sire had 4 socks and so does he.

yukidragon
Starters Handicap
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Oregon

Postby yukidragon » Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:36 pm

lol Sam you make my laugh to hard. :lol:

louis finochio
Darley line
Posts: 9181
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Alhambra-Calif.
Contact:

Postby louis finochio » Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:25 pm

I will quote what Tessio said this topic. I finally understood why two TB horses, although born of the same sire and dam, which our full brother and sister may turn out to be one chestnut a great runner and the other a bay a medicore runner.

Even Tessio the master breeder knew of this dominat and recessive color breeding pattern. So pay attention what color the superior runners are and you will be following the pattern Tessio used.
Those without sin cast the first stone.

Louis Finochio