and here is our mystery filly by sire unkown (but we have our suspicions):

Moderators: Roguelet, WaveMaster, madelyn


madelyn wrote:Regarding the mystery filly, I am working through the logistics. I have been promised a copy of the stud contract (which had a substantially reduced fee for the particular stallion). Once I have that in hand I will likely proceed through reporting the live foal and sending in the DNA. It is still a hefty fee, even at half off, so I will insure the filly if the DNA is positive, and pay the fee or see if the stud farm will work with me on it.
She is a very nice filly. Nickname is Immaculata (for Immaculate Conception). The farm where the dam was boarded last year said they never sent the mare to the stallion because "her cervix wasn't open."

madelyn wrote:Amazing Philly went on to race with her racing permit; without JC papers she is not "breeding stock" and she is now a child's riding horse on a farm in Pennsylvania, I believe.
In this case, the farm that reported to her prior owner that she had not been covered must be the culprits. The stud farm shows that she WAS covered, once in June, and the dates coincide. But no one even checked, since it was believed she was not covered.

madelyn wrote:Miss Ballet is a bit of a hardass mare to handle once she has a foal.. and after she struck and kicked everyone last year I swore her next foal would be named "Somethin' Wicked". But number one it's not available, and number two this year we've reached detente and she still pins her ears and swings that butt around but so far has allowed the filly to be handled. You should have seen her, though, when we took her to Hap (her date this year). She was NOT a happy mare.
.
Heidilady wrote:madelyn wrote:Amazing Philly went on to race with her racing permit; without JC papers she is not "breeding stock" and she is now a child's riding horse on a farm in Pennsylvania, I believe.
In this case, the farm that reported to her prior owner that she had not been covered must be the culprits. The stud farm shows that she WAS covered, once in June, and the dates coincide. But no one even checked, since it was believed she was not covered.
So couldn't they in theory test the covering stallion and put this thing to bed? I guess she must be a good riding horse but would there be any reason to breed her given the opportunity? I can't remember what she accomplished so if it's not significant enough to justify too much, I'm sure she's happy being ridden and nothing else.