TRACK VETS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE --- It's about time!

General on-topic discussion.

Moderators: Roguelet, hpkingjr, WaveMaster

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

TRACK VETS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE --- It's about time!

Postby BJ » Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:16 am

California Official Wants Vets Held Accountable for Medication Violations

by: Jack Shinar
TheHorse.com
http://thehorse.com/viewarticle.aspx?ID=7753

September 2006 Article # 7753

Rick Arthur, DVM, the new equine medical director of the California Horse Racing Board, told a meeting of state horse breeders Sept. 22 that he plans to hold veterinarians accountable when trainers they advise are found in violation of horse medication rules.
He cited a recent example in which a California trainer, who assumes ultimate responsibility for the horse's welfare under the state's "trainer insurance" rule, received a 30-day suspension from racing officials for a positive test for the class 2 drug Rompon (xylazine). The veterinarian who administered the medication got a $300 fine, he said.

"I think we got that backwards," Arthur told the California Thoroughbred Breeders' Association seminar held at Harris Ranch in Coalinga. "I'm probably not making many friends with veterinarians here. We're going to call them in. What you have to realize is that the trainer insurer rule is inherently wrong in cases like these, where the trainer is only following advice."

Arthur reasons that if veterinarians knew they were being held responsible, they would be more certain to stay within legal limits.

Arthur is leaving private practice after 30 years to head the equine medical director's office Sept. 23. Currently the vice president for Oak Tree Racing Association, chairman of the board of the California Thoroughbred Horsemen's Foundation and a member of the board of directors for the Grayson/Jockey Club Research Foundation, he said his main focus will be on drug testing, backside security and horse welfare.

In a rapid fire presentation to the 100 or so members of the CTBA on hand, Arthur noted that horse fatalities and injuries continue to cost the state's racing industry. There were 207 horse fatalities in 2003, 215 in 2004 and 272 in 2005, he said, and a recent study showed that the half-life of a Thoroughbred racing in California is just 12 months. Of a sample study of 3,150 horses, he said an average of 132 horses per month are taken out of training due to injuries.

Arthur said necropsy reports show that most of the horses sustain breakdowns "relatively early" after returning from lay-up and "90 percent of all fatalities show some evidence of prior stress fractures."

But, he added, given proper time to heal, that doesn't have to happen.

"Tiznow, Johar and Pleasantly Perfect all had diagnosed stress fractures prior to the year they won Breeders' Cup races," Arthur noted.

He said safety on California racetracks remains a "big issue" but synthetic tracks , such as that installed for the upcoming fall/winter meet at Hollywood Park, provide hope.

"(Synthetic) track is promising, when you look at the 20 fatalities at Turfway Park the preceding year compared to three last spring. There are concerns, frankly, how synthetic track will handle the heat at Santa Anita. But horses like it; they like to train over it. If you go out to Hollywood Park to watch them you can tell they like working on (Cushion Track)."

It has been a welcome relief to last fall and winter when Hollywood was suffering an average of one catastrophic breakdown a day, Arthur said.

On medication, he said he believes 80% of drug positives are the result of "inadvertent mistakes made at the barn" or ignorance of the rules. Arthur said he wants to develop and publish a manual containing withdrawal time data to help trainers understand the complicated system that governs the use of therapeutic medicine.

He said he will also push for more thresholds testing through blood because it is more accurate than urine analysis. And, he said there needs to be an increase in out-of-competition testing for blood doping--EPO and peptide hormones, for example.

Arthur said the CHRB will continue its vigilant pursuit of trainers who violate the 37-millimole limit for total carbon dioxide (TCO2), which he referred to as "bicarbonate loading." Arthur headed the committee that began the post-race testing in 2004 in cooperation with racetracks.

He said the problem has been nearly eliminated from Southern California, where there have been just two positive tests from 20,000 starters since September 2005. In the meantime, the University of California drug testing laboratory is compiling comprehensive data on trainers, paying particular attention to those who are close to exceeding the limit.

"Every trainer who has gone into the detention barn has had their horses drop in TCO2 levels," Arthur said, "and this includes the trainers who said they have no idea how the substance got into the horse's system."


I LOVE this magazine! 8) And I hope Doc Arthur sticks to his guns and keeps his stated intentions 8)

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:30 pm

Hi BJ

Is he implying that all trainers are using bicarb to some extent?

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Postby BJ » Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:54 pm

Mike wrote:Hi BJ

Is he implying that all trainers are using bicarb to some extent?


I know he's NOT implying "all trainers". But the trainers that many have complained about and most have been afraid to speak up about, have MYSTERIOUSLY not had their horses run as well, when they are being "watched" and their horses are detained for a couple of days before they race. :wink:

I also think they should test ANY horse that pulls up or breaks down in a race. Not just the horses that win, or randomly test because they were "in the money". I would bet we would find many a horse being overly drugged to just be able to "get by the track vet" before a race.

I'm told they caught a trainer a while back who was "blocking" crippled claimers to get by the vet, so he could lose them in the claiming box, when medications and ankle injections couldn't hold them together anymore to race competitively. Of course they had to "claim the horse" to be able to test it. In that case, (and in most cases like that), I believe it was both the trainer and the Vet "in bed" together.

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:29 pm

Very interesting BJ. We probably get some here but not as much.

wilf
Breeder's Cup Contender
Posts: 1882
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 10:50 am
Location: Ocala, Florida.

Postby wilf » Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:49 pm

Hey Mike! I lived and worked down-under for 18 years mostly with top class runners in Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and the Gold Coast and their use of drugs of any kind was minimal but the vet science was top notch and the training routines were tuned towards the ultimate finess and readiness of the horse. Over here you have to be as much a psychiatrist and physician yourself as the tracks are like prisons with surfaces leaving much to be desired. Each state has different rules and thresholds for drugs which is a farce in itself but the horse is always the loser. Its great to see Rick Arthur take a stand against practices detrimental to the integrity of the game. Funnily enough they are overseeing infringements that in Australia would cop fines of $10,000 or more with a years suspension.

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:53 pm

Amazing Wilf. I hope it remains unchanged here!

User avatar
BenB
Sophomore Sire
Posts: 3213
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Postby BenB » Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:15 pm

A horse found with the named medication in his blood overhere, would be enough for the trainer losing his job forever, and faces court for criminal activity against animals.
Sometimes chemical meds, are not to be sufficient broken down in the horses bodies, so there will be always traces left from that use.
But that are not the easiest stuff in using, and certainly not used without a cause

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Postby BJ » Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:16 pm

BenB wrote:A horse found with the named medication in his blood overhere, would be enough for the trainer losing his job forever, and faces court for criminal activity against animals.
Sometimes chemical meds, are not to be sufficient broken down in the horses bodies, so there will be always traces left from that use.
But that are not the easiest stuff in using, and certainly not used without a cause


Isn't it interesting though...how it is considered animal cruelty to use medications to race horses on, but NOT animal cruelty to slaughter them and transport them in such horrific and terrifying (to the horse) conditions? I know your country is Denmark, and I know nothing of its slaughter laws, but I do know U.S. laws and I also know a neighbor of yours, Sweden, also has horse slaughter.

So, while it is great that your country seems strong in some ways on animal cruelty and making horse trainers be honest and ethical, it seems all kind of a sick joke, when those same governments allow horse slaughter and it isn't considered animal cruelty for a trainer or owner to just ship a horse off to slaughter. :?

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:42 pm

Ben comes from Holland doesn't he?

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Postby BJ » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:39 pm

Mike wrote:Ben comes from Holland doesn't he?


Woops :oops: Got my "D" words mixed up. :oops: Oh well, I get lost going around the block :oops:

Sorry about the Geography error :? But the point remains the same. Especially since The Netherlands borders Belgium and Belgium is a major horsemeat consumer country.

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:12 pm

Don't forget that the cow is sacred in some countries. Whats to say we are right and they are wrong? Tolerance of others is what's required.

jellac
Grade I Winner
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Postby jellac » Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:52 pm

Thank you Mike for a voice of reason....and perspective.

BJ
Horse of the Year
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:39 pm

Postby BJ » Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:56 pm

jellac wrote:Thank you Mike for a voice of reason....and perspective.


Great idea Jellac. Let's make the horse sacred! I mean, shouldn't it be anyway, to all those that use it to make a living?

User avatar
BenB
Sophomore Sire
Posts: 3213
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Postby BenB » Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:13 pm

Thanks Mike for your geografic view.
And I am a very tolerate man.
Only I just can,t understand the obuse from drugs and medication for horse racing, no other than harmening horsekind in the long run.
There are about 38 european completely seperate counries with their own
governements. And own reiging bodies.
In our country horses were sent to the slaughters in each village, nowdays they are gooiing to be humanly destroyed, or sent away to slaughterhouses elsewhere in europe but with intercontinental haulers
en rested, food and drink supply each four hours.
If I would take a decision, or drug my filly for racing, or humanly destroying I choose for the last option.

Mike
Allowance Winner
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Australia

Postby Mike » Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:05 pm

I agree with you there Ben, but I would choose to do neither.